ModelRailroadForums.com is a free Model Railroad Discussion Forum and photo gallery. We cover all scales and sizes of model railroads. Online since 2002, it's one of the oldest and largest model railroad forums on the web. Whether you're a master model railroader or just getting started, you'll find something of interest here.
Nice video. Easements and super elevation do make a difference. I am in HO scale and started my layout over 30 years ago hand laying code 70 track or using flex track. My curves are super elevated, but i a different way, and trains look really good coming out of curves onto level track.
I pretty well just eyeball them, gradually working into the radius. Click in the "New Cab Ride" in my signature below and you can take a rode over the layout. My minimum radius is 32" but most are a lot broader. I used the open grid method, using half inch plywood for sub road bed and used a level to set the super elevation. It's hard to see in the video. Using flex track, an easement is almost automatic. When I first got out of the service and was living in Florida I was in train withwrawal and built a small N scale layout I could slide under a bed. The guys at the hobby shop introduced me to flex track around 1972 and I would never consider and sectional track since.
Here are a few photos of the old N scale layout I tore out in the late 70's
Ron.......nice video....that is how I did my easements. In building my layout, I installed acurve without an easement and another one with an easement. A noticeable difference. All my curves now have easements. On the super elevation I used .20 .30 & .40 styrene strips. Another great affect but I think maybe little less noticeable than the easements. But I do like the affect. All my mainline curves are super elevated. Chet...... Nice pics of your n scale railroad.......I see you have some pacific northwest operating fluid in the lower left corner.......lol