New Camera

ModelRailroadForums.com is a free Model Railroad Discussion Forum and photo gallery. We cover all scales and sizes of model railroads. Online since 2002, it's one of the oldest and largest model railroad forums on the web. Whether you're a master model railroader or just getting started, you'll find something of interest here.


hamltnblue

Active Member
Hello All.
After spending a few nights reading reviews I picked up one of these today. The Caon T2i. It was released a month ago and it's getting great reviews.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10020806canoneos550d.asp
The specs are very close to the 7D, which is the pro version. It also has a plastic body where the 7D is more rugged.
It also does full HD movies.
Can't wait for the battery to charge so I can give it a try :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
you'll love it!

(hint: get another battery, you'll always need another. I currently have 5... Many aftermarket brands are fine, I have bought them from 19.99 to 34.99.)
 
Nice camera! I sure wish I never sold my Canon G9, I need another new one, Canon is the best.
 


Good Idea on the battery :)
Only used it for a few shots so far. Will take some getting used to. I've been using my 4 plus year old konica minolta and the menu's and button layout are a bit different. I also have just the lens that came with it for now. The Konica is a different format so the 2 lenses aren't compatible. It also has a very nice feel.
 
great cam. at this point there is no need for a review really. once you cross about 200$ line , everything is pretty remarkable piece of equipment by any brand. narrows down to how you personally like the design and comfort. now lets see some pictures :)

EDIT
and as far as battery, my came with 2 and i never really manage to drain the first one, its simply keeps going. between the 2 i figure i have about 800 clicks. if one needs more then obviously
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nice camera the T1 is a very good DSLR now its time for fast glass, the Canon 17-40L4 is a must have for any canon shooter. Its on my 5D 60% of the time great for model RR shots along with most around the house shots.
 
I've been using DSLR for a few years but never got into it other than using it as point and shoot. A newbie question, what is fast glass? Also what makes the Canon 17-40L4 better than the stock lens which has a similar range? I know there is a difference but am clueless of what it is.
 
Fast glass ie the canon L line is a higher quality glass in the lens, faster acting auto focus also it lets you run a true F 4 and is very sharp. the image quality of the higher end lenses is highly noticeable, also its performance in lower light far exceeds the base lens. Well worth the $1000 or so for the lens.
 
go over to canon-on-the.net its a great canon only website. if that link does work just search it and it will pop up.
 


Fast glass ie the canon L line is a higher quality glass in the lens, faster acting auto focus also it lets you run a true F 4 and is very sharp. the image quality of the higher end lenses is highly noticeable, also its performance in lower light far exceeds the base lens. Well worth the $1000 or so for the lens.

When I think of the amount of model railroad stuff I could get for $1000...
 
Fast glass isn't really needed for model railroad photography. Most shots should be on a tripod, and with the lens stopped down for maximum depth of field. And low light performance shouldn't be a requirement for model photos. Real world ones, yes.

I've gotten some great shots with the 18-55mm IS lens that came with my Canon XSi, but now use a Sigma 17-70mm most of the time because of its longer range. I only have it because I bought it in like new condition for about a third of its $600.00 price.

BTW I've updated my model railroad photography website this week with seven pages of sample photos of mine, with behind the scenes shots showing how they were done.
 
Fast glass isn't really needed for model railroad photography. Most shots should be on a tripod, and with the lens stopped down for maximum depth of field. And low light performance shouldn't be a requirement for model photos. Real world ones, yes.

.....

good points, Bob. One thing to look at if you are more serious than most about mrr photography is the minimum aperture. Most photographers talk about maximum aperture (smaller f#s), but for maximizing that depth of field (dof) and therefore the realism of the shot, a smaller aperture (big f#) is much-more-better for miniatures work. One of the surprises I found when I realized this was that my very cheap ($150 new!) Canon 75-300 has a minimum aperture (@300mm) of f45! On most lenses, the more you zoom the smaller the aperture becomes. (example, on that 75-300, the min aperture at 75mm is f32, but at 300mm it is f45)

Now, if you can do a shot on your layout at 300mm and get anything but a small spot on a wall, well, you've got something. Or a very large layout....

For not a lot of $$ you can get a pinhole lens with an effective aperture of near f100. Now those are fun!

MRR shots are usually done with no flash and in aperture priority mode with, as Bob said, the aperture set as far as it will go (big #). The camera (if in Av) will set the shutter speed where it needs so you get a good pic regardless of the light. In most cases the shutter speed is going to be very very slow, on the order of 1 or more seconds, so a tripod really isn't an option, it's absolutely required.

Another spec to look at when choosing a lens for MRR work is the minimum focus distance. Anything closer than that will always be out of focus and need to be removed to help the shot work. On that 75-300 above, the min focus is 5' so it really isn't as usable as I might wish.

A good site to look at for all sorts of depth-of-field answers is:
www.dofmaster.com

they even have an iPhone app, i use it in the field all the time.
 
Pretty funny reading some of the forums. The "pro's" seem to thumb their nose at it like it's a toy compared to their 7D or 5D version ii or whatever. I went to the site mentioned earlier and read a thread on the camera I got. The specs are pretty close, but since they paid double the price and it's a consumer version, many thumb their nose at it. They probably never tried it.
http://forums.mycanikon.com/showthread.php?9253-Canon-EOS-Rebel-T2i
Yes, it's not the "Pro Version" but it is a 18mp camera with almost all of the same features. It has a plastic body vs the better body of it's cousin but you can almost make it out of gold and not justify the 900 buck price difference. I'm sure I'm missing something but it's not obvious.
 
the pros forget that couple years ago even their pro level cams were not reaching the level of today's prosumer cams. i absolutely love that it is no longer about equipment. well, it really never was about the particular cam one uses, but today it is clearer then ever. its the person behind it.

cameras are all nice, produce brilliant pictures while compensating for our human incompetency to some point. silly to argue which is better at this point. i like my nikon d300 over canon for one reason only - at the moment it has the advantage in that i own that cam and can take pictures it it while i can't take them with canon (since i don't own one) . i'm sure i would be 100% satisfied with either one.

in the end of the day, shoot what you have, use whatever optics that you have and enjoy it.

and BTW, yet again,lets see some pics with new camera ! even if they not perfect i'm sure canon'iers over here can give you some more pointers
 
Finally got to shoot a couple of pics. Just playing with the settings at this point
IMG_0138.png

IMG_0137.png

IMG_0136.png
 




Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a commision from some of the links and ads shown on this website (Learn More Here)

Back
Top