ModelRailroadForums.com is a free Model Railroad Discussion Forum and photo gallery. We cover all scales and sizes of model railroads. Online since 2002, it's one of the oldest and largest model railroad forums on the web. Whether you're a master model railroader or just getting started, you'll find something of interest here.
Sinebar...don't know how much room you have, but the first thought that came to mind went something like this:
(Hidden stage/ rev loop)-station-mainline track-station-(hidden stage/rev loop)
How about a dogbone with the ends hidden and a large passenger station in the middle of the bone? Not point-to-point BUT you can concentrate on modeling 1 very nice / large station like Denver instead of splitting your $$$ and effort between 2 and you can have lots of traffic moving through while staging is hidden. This would be called a "railfan layout" by some.
If you want to do something like LA Union Station and points east, you might want to consider a shelf layout with your stations on each end.
How about a dogbone with the ends hidden and a large passenger station in the middle of the bone? Not point-to-point BUT you can concentrate on modeling 1 very nice / large station like Denver instead of splitting your $$$ and effort between 2 and you can have lots of traffic moving through while staging is hidden. This would be called a "railfan layout" by some.
If you want to do something like LA Union Station and points east, you might want to consider a shelf layout with your stations on each end.
I have a question. Are you looking to run your trains annd watch them go, or are you looking to run a terminal and switch your engines and passenger service between destinations?
I have a question. Are you looking to run your trains annd watch them go, or are you looking to run a terminal and switch your engines and passenger service between destinations?
Yeah, that will certainly make a difference in planning. If push comes to shove, you can always Google Earth or Bing some prototype stations to get an idea of the track layouts. E.g. Ogilvie Transportation Ctr (ex-CNW) in Chicago is a stub ended station with a couple spurs at the end of the platforms to service METRA engines. CUS is a stub ended station with a large Amtrak facility and a large METRA (BNSF) facility on the south side and a runthrough on the east side of the station to "cheat" on the stub endedness
I think Armstrong's Track Planning for Realistic Operation has a section on passenger terminals.