ModelRailroadForums.com is a free Model Railroad Discussion Forum and photo gallery. We cover all scales and sizes of model railroads. Online since 2002, it's one of the oldest and largest model railroad forums on the web. Whether you're a master model railroader or just getting started, you'll find something of interest here.
I discovered the problem. The Walthers cars do NOT separated down at floor level,...but rather their tops come off. That nixes them as candidates for a pusher loco project I have in mind.
I discovered the problem. The Walthers cars do NOT separated down at floor level,...but rather their tops come off. That nixes them as candidates for a pusher loco project I have in mind.
It isn't really classified as a freight car. It is an express reefer so called a "head end car" because it would normally be run at the head end of a passenger train. Notice it does not have standard freight trucks, but rather high speed passenger type trucks.
Here is a photo of some on the Santa Fe Grand Canyon Limited in San Bernadino. In this case strawberries headed east.
And another with three reefers immediately behind the locos, from a year later
I have definitely decided to use 3-4 of those reefer/express cars as bodies for my recently acquired Kato diesel chassis in building some 'powered freight cars' to help push my steam engines along. I'll likely use the Athearn bodies.
The short chassis will have coupler issues. A body mount at the end will not work as pictured because the end of the car will swing out really far on curves and the couplers will not be able to handle the difference. You would have to find some way to make a really long shank swinging arm coupler (on the order of Lionel) to reach from the x-switcher coupler pocket to the end of the car. OR if you could find a way to stretch the chassis, those Alco wheels look pretty good under that car.
The short chassis will have coupler issues. A body mount at the end will not work as pictured because the end of the car will swing out really far on curves and the couplers will not be able to handle the difference. You would have to find some way to make a really long shank swinging arm coupler (on the order of Lionel) to reach from the x-switcher coupler pocket to the end of the car. OR if you could find a way to stretch the chassis, those Alco wheels look pretty good under that car.
Perhaps my posting was confusing here? I will be cutting that original chassis in half and lengthening it so those coupler mounts will now be at the end of the car. I'll likely use 2 stiff lengths of steel, on edge, along either side of the motor to regain the stiffness of the cut chassis, .....then attach some lead weights to increase it's traction power,...something like this..
Perhaps my posting was confusing here? I will be cutting that original chassis in half and lengthening it so those coupler mounts will now be at the end of the car.
Just a few re-thoughts on that 'frame stiffener'. Any frame stiffener would likely need to be 'permanently' adhered to those existing frame plates at either end. But they need to provide access to the motor, drive shafts, etc,so likely something like that steel rule on edge would NOT be appropriate. Have to come up with another idea?