Newbies Attempt to Wire DCC Layout..HELP


SPfan

Member
I'm just about finished laying track on my layout, and I'm trying to figure out a wiring question (probably a real basic one). Is there any advantage to using Atlas terminal track vs Atlas terminal joiners? It's a 4 x 8' HO DCC layout, with Atals code 83 track. I plan on using the NCE Power Cab and running 2-3 trains max. Any advice is appreciated. Oh, and I'm not very good with a solder gun.

Thanks In Advance,
Brandon




Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most.
 
Really no difference except it's easy to pull the wire off a terminal joiner and not know it once the track is ballasted. Assuming all the wires are in the right place terminal tracks or terminal joiners will do the same job. For people who really can't solder, terminal joiners are a good way to get some extra feeders to the layout. Not as reliable as soldering but not as bad as just one feeder.
 
I would use a few terminal joiners... That way if one would break you will have others for back up. It will look better then a terminal track.
 
It is a good practise to provide some redundancy in your electrical distribution system. I don't mean doubling up your bus and feeders, but certainly you should have multiple feeders to your rail system. Metal joiners should do a good job of ensuring distribution for the most part, but they are notorious for letting you down due to oxidation over time, and also due to simple mechanical failure...they do seem to widen and splay in places where your tracks manage to flex and torsion when heavy engines pass over head. The result is intermittent train performance...always bad and frustrating.

How important are looks to you? If you are early to the hobby, a terminal track may be an important item for you for the sake of a notional grade crossing and a rerailer if it also doubles as that feature as the Bachmann ones do. If you would prefer a more realistic look, and less of a "this-is-all-wired-up" look, then soldered feeders are the ticket, and somewhat more reliable than the mere metal joiners. Now you must decide if you want that reliability at your own hand with soldering feeders or just purchased and used the Company's terminal joiners. I hope you are catching my drift...they're still metal joiners. You may feed them courtesy of Atlas, but if the metal to rail interface should fail, which is what I contended at the outset, you still have fed joiners that have failed. No further ahead in my frame of reasoning.

So, you still are faced with a continuity problem to the rails. My point is that you really should develop a facility with soldering and use the terminal joiners by also soldering the joiners to the rails they join, or simply make your own feeders and solder them to the rails at places where your system's needs are better met. Let the joiners only provide mechanical alignment, and whatever continuity they can. But soldered feeders are where the majority of model train enthusiasts find a safe refuge...and fewer heart attacks caused by anger and frustration.

To sum up my rationale: regular metal joiners and terminal joiners are still metal joiners that fail because they are ...joiners. There are two possible solutions: solder the joiners to the rails at intervals, or cut your own 22 gauge wires to length, bare their ends, and solder each end to something that is part of your power source-to-rail system. Soldered feeders properly done will provide years of foolproof power directly to your rails.
 
Ah ha. Got it! I guess I forgot to add one final question. Is there a way to get power to your track, without soldering?

Thanks Again
 
A tip of the old hat to all you guys!


Many Thanks!
Brandon
__________________________________________
Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most.
 



Back
Top