What Era do you Model?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NP2626
  • Start date Start date
ModelRailroadForums.com is a free Model Railroad Discussion Forum and photo gallery. We cover all scales and sizes of model railroads. Online since 2002, it's one of the oldest and largest model railroad forums on the web. Whether you're a master model railroader or just getting started, you'll find something of interest here.


What Era do you model?

  • Pre year 1900.

    Votes: 1 2.1%
  • 1901 to 1930.

    Votes: 5 10.6%
  • 1931 to the beginning of diesels.

    Votes: 4 8.5%
  • The Transition.

    Votes: 11 23.4%
  • Steam is dead to the beginning of Second Generation Diesels.

    Votes: 3 6.4%
  • Second Generation Diesels, to Third Generation Diesels.

    Votes: 8 17.0%
  • Third generation Diesels (The Modern Era).

    Votes: 5 10.6%
  • I don't Model no STINKIN' Eras, I do what I want!!

    Votes: 10 21.3%

  • Total voters
    47
  • Poll closed .
O.K., the Poll is meaningless, if true, I can live with that, too! However, I wonder why Modern Model Railroaders wouldn't be partaking in this forum?

Any pollster will tell you that with a smaller number of respondents, the margin of error of actually being *accurately* representative of the larger population is very high.
 
My "oldest" engine is a GP7.
My "newest" would be an AEM-7.
So I guess "the era I model" falls between those two points...
My "oldest" engine is a GP7.
My "newest" would be an AEM-7.
So I guess "the era I model" falls between those two points...

Something I was not paying attention to is the fact that NOT MODELING AN ERA appears to be the one of the most popular eras!
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Well
I like cabooses and F units and other stuff from my childhood, so thats what I buy. Not really modeling an era per say it just turns out that way.
 
I over heard once, "Who says I can't run a caboose behind a Gevo locomotive???"

Greg

1581609625230.png
 


Again, HUH?!?
I’ll take a stab at it...

Less people polled means greater margins of error.
let’s say there are 1 million MRRs in the world. You’ve polled about 30. That is a fraction of a fraction; making the poll pretty isolated.
But, you are basically polling the more active members of this one site. Making your poll very accurate under that specific parameter. The results are interesting non the less.
Keep on polling, pollster. I love a good set of data points.
 
I’ll take a stab at it...

Less people polled means greater margins of error.
let’s say there are 1 million MRRs in the world. You’ve polled about 30. That is a fraction of a fraction; making the poll pretty isolated.
But, you are basically polling the more active members of this one site. Making your poll very accurate under that specific parameter. The results are interesting non the less.
Keep on polling, pollster. I love a good set of data points.
But....but. That's what I said.
 
Toot, I'm guessing you sure did; however, I found what you said to be slightly confusing! I'm sure this is all me and as the King Crimson song goes, "Confusion will be my epitaph"!
 
My 2 cents. I will be modeling the CB&Q around 1962 in central Illinois. Plenty of Blackbirds and Greybacks to see, and best of all, before Lou Menk had his way!
 
Again, HUH?!?

If you ask 1000 random people at a train show, and 20 people from the same N-Track club, you may get VERY different results.

The smaller the poll, the less accurate it may be of representing the "whole". That's "margin of error".
 


I have always understood that a small number of people responding to a Poll meant that the accuracy of the poll might be inaccurate.
 




Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a commision from some of the links and ads shown on this website (Learn More Here)

Back
Top