The 60/40 Layout And Other Railway Related Things

ModelRailroadForums.com is a free Model Railroad Discussion Forum and photo gallery. We cover all scales and sizes of model railroads. Online since 2002, it's one of the oldest and largest model railroad forums on the web. Whether you're a master model railroader or just getting started, you'll find something of interest here.


Man those things aren't meant to go around curves. Cut it in half and make 2.



I know, I've widened both tracks, but anything this length will now be relegated to the outer track only, the curve is just too tight and the trucks don't traverse that far and simply derail. If I take the inside track out any more, I run the real risk of a collision and a fall of 4' to the floor, as you can see. Before anyone say's that I should add a board or some perspex to avoid anything falling off, it's not that easy, this is the side that is usually stored vertically when not in use.

1680791248956.jpeg


moved both tracks as far as I can, nice thing about using screws vs caulk, no mess.

1680791365574.jpeg
 


One more idea you have given me. Avoid 80" passenger cars even though that's what the have on the CSR. I like the old fashion ones better anyway. So there's another plan. Keep it small, keep it simple.
I've 4 84' UP passenger coaches, which I still need to add new couplers to. I regret buying them as I doubt they will ever see my layout. I'll add the couplers and sell them, no point in keeping them, weirdly, unlike UK passenger coaches, they have no interior's, seems they're "extra" for some reason.

I'd stick to shorter rolling stock, I think in the long run you'll have far more variety to work with, even second hand ones, give them a re-paint and new decals for your particular RR, who's to know?
The big new stuff is really nice, but you've got to have long curves, the bigger the better to use them.

I've plenty of UK OO scale wagons and passenger cars, so at some point I may do a re-paint (maybe not :) ) and use them behind my HO engines, definitely not pro-typical, but I can't keep buying more to justify that, to me it's a hobby, it's supposed to be fun.
 
Last edited:


It probably to hold the bugger in place until the glue set
Glue! Glue !, don't use the stuff apart from on structures, it really is there to hold the track. If you look to the left on the original photo you'll see a vertical line, that's where the layout splits in two, a track screw doesn't hold the track in place there, so I replaced it with a larger screw and the washer makes sure the screw doesn't disappear between the rail ties. :)
 
Last edited:


Two or three small passenger cars look realistic on small layouts imo.

David
I was looking at some "old time" passenger cars, but three problems, first is they look so out of place behind any diesel, even a GP7, secondly, rarely does anyone list the length, and I spend an hour looking up the specs for it, third and most importantly, guess where they all are, yep in the US, I've looked at maybe getting some German or French passenger cars, but they all look so untypical of their US counterparts.

I'm going to look at perhaps getting some BR Mk 1 or 2 or Gresley Teak coaches and seeing if I can re-paint and decal them for a US RR, (anything but UP) that might work, but for the moment, that's in the "maybe" pile.
 




Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a commision from some of the links and ads shown on this website (Learn More Here)

Back
Top