chadbag
Well-Known Member
The problem may be that the spending is not directed into areas that would benefit Americans, create jobs and wealth in America, instead of worrying about our so called Allies. We financed the transportation infrastructure in Europe and Japan after we blew it up in WW2, then permitted these countries to dump their manufactured goods on us below cost, while we garrisoned troops to protect them from the Big Bad Bear. Meanwhile, we allowed our own transportation infrastructure to deteriorate, and manufacturing to evaporate because it was "free enterprise"
Why do we have shortages today? A. We don't make anything, everything is produced off shore...
Amen. The former president was on to something when he wanted NATO to pay its own way and tried to move manufacturing back to the US.
And while I am not a great believe in higher taxes on the rich and I think the corporate income tax rate should be 0% (as corporations/businesses do not pay taxes -- their customers do through higher prices), I think that all products imported into the US with a US company name on them should have a 50% tariff applied -- ie, Mattel makes toys in China and imports them and sells them under the Mattel name -- 50% duty. If Wang Chung Red Dragon Ltd & Co. makes toys and imports them into the US and sells them under their own name, they should pay some nominal duty. Imports should compete on their merits with US goods. US goods made in China are not US goods. Any US company manufacturing overseas has moved jobs. Companies that want to participate in the economy need to fully participate by giving as well as receiving, not just taking.
"free enterprise" doesn't truly exist. Most countries protect their markets. US companies don't have carte blanche to import INTO China and sell in that market. You can't have truly "free enterprise" unless every one is playing by the same rules worldwide. The US cannot open its economy without all other countries reciprocating. (And I am not sure even then that a true open market like that would be a good idea).
Most of the spending the US in the US goes into transfers of wealth and social programs, hands down. And that is what makes us weak. When people get it for free, they have no desire to work for things. They become dependent. As the welfare state has grown in the US, we have had more and more economic problems and less and less wealth in the middle class. Lower marginal tax rates are not the problem -- the nanny state is.
The spending that goes to "Allies" is microscopic compared to that. I am not defending the spending on "Allies" and think that we need to be much more careful and stingy with that, but even completely eliminating that wouldn't change much US budget wise.
