'round the Bend

[Switch Track]

As I am planning my layout, I am thrown for a curve of sorts. What radius curves would be appropriate? I am thinking 24" would be generic for my layout. Also, to avoid track kinks, I am probably going to use preformed curve track. So what would be the purpose of using curves with a larger radius?


Happy New Year,

ST

 

[stlgevo51]

What scale is this?

 

[UP2CSX]

ST, since I know you're doing HO, 24" curves are a good choice for most rolloing stock and engines. The large radius curves you can fit in the better. Your trains will run smoother, you can run bigger equipment, and the trains wil look more realistic on larger curves with less overhang.

Think again about the sectional track for curves. You are more likely to get kinks with sectional track since you have a joint every 8 inches or so. With flex track, you only have a joint every three feet and the joints will automatically get staggered as you cut the rail for the curves. It's much easier to concentrate on a perfect joint every three feet than every 8 inches. If you use Model Engineering flex track, I think you'll find it very easy to lay good curves compared to Atlas track, since ME track will hold the curve shape rather than trying to springing back towards straight, like Atlas flex will do.

 

[Switch Track]

UP2CSX,

Thanks so much...once again!!! Had I come to you much earlier, I would not have squandered so much money on E-Z Track!!!

So far I am pretty much going with ME Code 83 track, Peco turnouts, and 3/8" plywood.

BTW, from what I remember using my old American Flyer set, I do agree that larger curve radii look better and enable locomotives to retain greater stability, especially at higher speeds.


Happy New Year,

ST

 

[Switch Track]

stlgevo51,

HO.


Happy New Year,

ST