ModelRailroadForums.com is a free Model Railroad Discussion Forum and photo gallery. We cover all scales and sizes of model railroads. Online since 2002, it's one of the oldest and largest model railroad forums on the web. Whether you're a master model railroader or just getting started, you'll find something of interest here.
I was about to ask the difference between code 100 and code 83 track. Atlas does a good job at explaining it on their site. For all the other newbies that may find this thread and wonder the differences, CLICK.
Micro Engineering Code 83 Flex. It looks amazing and holds its shape. It is harder to work with then Atlas. I also handlay track with Micro Engineering Code 83 and Code 70 Rail.
Walthers(Shinohara) makes nice switches in Code 83, but getting them can be very hard. So I'm making Code 83 switches using the Fast Tracks system and Micro Engineering rail.
Micro Engineering Code 83 Flex. It looks amazing and holds its shape. It is harder to work with then Atlas. I also handlay track with Micro Engineering Code 83 and Code 70 Rail.
Walthers(Shinohara) makes nice switches in Code 83, but getting them can be very hard. So I'm making Code 83 switches using the Fast Tracks system and Micro Engineering rail.
Why not the "quick connect" type of track like Bachmann E-Z Track? Other then being limited to only the lengths/types sold, are they a lesser quality? Just looking for opinions.
I use Bachmann E-Z track on part of my layout. There's nothing of lesser quality compared to other types of track. There's a bigger variety of curve radius tracks being produced all the time. I would actually recommend this track for a beginner since it will get a layout up and running faster than any other kind of track. The biggest problems are the turnouts. The don't have positive point closure so cars are forever picking the points. If Bachmann would improve thier turnouts, I think the E-Z track system is very viable for most layouts.
All of my mainline is code 70 (HO) with code 83 used for hidden track. The majority is hand laid. Mine is a small branch line railroad, and the use od lighter rail will limit locomotive size. I model the steam to diesel transition (1957). The largest steam locomotive I use is a Mikado (2-8-2) and most diesels are a B-B truck with a couple of C-C locomotives, SD-7.
I'm using a mix of Atlas code 83 with wood ties and concrete ties. I've seen on the prototypes, they lay one track on a double track mainline with concrete and leave the other wood.
Ken, that just means that in a few years you'll have to tear the other track out on the main and put in new track with concrete ties when the upgrade is scheduled!
I'm going to be using Atlas code 55 flex for my n scale empire. That means replacing all the wheels on my older equipment with new low profile wheels. They'll look a lot better as well. The difference in appearance with the Atlas code 55 flex to the old Atlas flex track is like night and day.
I just picked up a bunch (20 sections) of Shinohara flexi code 83 off evilbay for considerably less than I can get Atlas locally.
That will take care of half of my needs. Atlas 83 for the rest.
BTW: Reading up on Shinohara/Walthers turn outs makes me think I should use them. I need 8-10 and the premium is not too much to bear. Finding what I want will be the biggest part of the problem....I still have a week or 3 before I need em'.