What size shelf for 28 inch radius curves

ModelRailroadForums.com is a free Model Railroad Discussion Forum and photo gallery. We cover all scales and sizes of model railroads. Whether you're a master model railroader or just getting started, you'll find something of interest here.


MHinLA

Well-Known Member
I have told you before that code 100 scales out to 8.7". Please do not mislead newbies. Yes it is a bit oversize, but not as much as you represent.
If you put a ruler to C100, the rail is just about 5/32" tall. Even if it depicts only 11", not 14", it's still 3"-5" overly tall...No way is C100 in HO..8.7". Code 83 is about that..Informing new comers of certain ancient or archaic aspects of the hobby they might not, typically aren't normally aware of, and may in fact be very happy to have been alerted to, is not 'misleading' them; no diff than explaining why/why not DC/DCC... One's old. One's new...
If Atlas were to at least correct the code 100 ties to its scale size and color, as their code 83 is, perhaps I'd like it a bit more..But as it stands this stuff is a 70+ year old design from back when toy trains had overly deep flanges. (And there was a reason for that in the 1950s).
As calls by serious scale modelers for more in-scale flanges were finally being met by Athearn, Atlas, BMann and others, so did the call for more scale-height rail eventually get answered with the advent of code 83 (The sequence of events may be reversed but it still is to the same end).
Whatever positive or negative responses it may cause, this is my last post in this thread... 😷 Thanks, M
 
Last edited:

santafewillie

Well-Known Member
Misleading only refers to the 14" b******t. I make no claims as to whether or not it is prototypical. I even stated that it was a bit oversized
87 x .100 = 8.7 For comparison, 87 x .083 = 7.22 (approx). What am I missing here?

From dccwiki.com

H0 ScalePrototype Rail
CodePounds per yardHeight, inchesApplication
1001528.7PRR Heavy rail (155lb) used in the mountains
831267.1Main line applications
751146.5Main line, passing sidings
701006Sidings, industrial
55834.7Sidings, industrial, Narrow gauge railways
40603.5Narrow gauge and industrial railways

this is my last post in this thread...
OK then!
 

Greg@mnrr

Section Hand
On my layout I have one area that is difficult to reach and as I added scenery and structures, now working on this area became increasingly difficult. I did purchase one of those Top Side Elevated Creeper platform from Micro-Mark in case I did need to do more major work in this area in the future.

1595345472035.png


Knowing how far you can reach into a layout after the the area is finished is as important as checking your "reach" prior to construction. Why ruin your work by reaching in and over and hitting with your arm on structures you detailed and painstaking built?

Note: The creeper is well constructed, but difficult to move around, heavy and takes up a lot of territory to store. It will live under th layout expansion when that happens.

Greg

#############
 

Sirfoldalot

Product Tester ACME INC.
Staff member
Willie -- I appreciate the reference you posted above. There is some nice information there of which has given me some knowledge that I had forgotten about and some new as well.

I am a little concerned about the 2" spacing that the OP is talking about. I have let slide much of my brain power, but seems to me that I remember that to run longer passenger and freight cars that you need greater than 2 inch centerlines?
 

santafewillie

Well-Known Member
2" spacing is fine for tangent track, a little tight but it works. It must be spaced much further on curves, even broad ones, to 2.75" or more depending on the curve radius.
 

MHinLA

Well-Known Member
OK. My final input over this code 100 fracas...If it does represent 8.7" at paradoxically, 87:1 scale ratio, that still is roundoutable at 9". And I'm happy to move on with that being the finalized, recognized, and accepted hobby-industry heavy, 152 lb. HO rail...
I now realize gang that the larger side of my, or maybe the only side of my dislike of code 100 has always then, been the black, out of scale ties and spikes which, sorry, is hideous to me... If there were enough push for it in the hobby, I'd be right with you trying to get Atlas to re-tool, if need be, in order to have brown, correctly scaled/spaced Delryn HO ties under it !! I'd make a hi speed main with it myself if my situ called for it....
...So. In closing..(if I haven't made the equivalent of one already !), yes I like code 100 rail in HO (or larger scales)..But in HO it'd, for me, have to be for heavy traffic depiction and on scale ties..
🏭 🏭 ☀🛤 🏨 🏪 🏡🏠 🚽M
 
Last edited:

Selector

Well-Known Member
If 155 pound rail is 8" high in the USA, and it is, then 1/87th of that in conversion to HO is only 0.092" rounded. Code 100 is slightly larger, 1.08 times to be exact. and would therefore equate to about 155 X 1.08, or 168 pound rail (taking some liberties with mass X volume or height), which nobody ever used. Even if it comes out to only 160 pounds with proper dimensioning, it's still considerably heavier and larger than 155 pound rail.
 

MHinLA

Well-Known Member
Selector,
now, after I finally gave up on calling C100 too tall, having gobs of folks convince me C100 is a tad below 9 scale inches [see graph/post 23], here you come along now, sounding like me before I came to my realization and confession about how I'd been wrong about C100; that it's really been .............the ties !! :eek: M

This will be my final input in this thread...
 
Last edited:

RCH

Been Nothin' Since Frisco
One thing you can do to expand the spacing of your track on curves is to use the same radius on two parallel tracks, which causes the curve on the outer track to begin after the inside track begins (as measured along the centerline of the inside track) and end before the inside track ends. The geometry of the curve being constructed and the radius of the curve will determine how much spacing you gain.

So, if you were going to fill a 90° angle with two parallel tracks spaced 2" apart, the outer curve would begin 2" after the inner curve started and end 2" before the inner curve ends. The spacing at the beginning and end of each curve would be 2" apart, but it would be 2.83" at the midpoint of the curves.

If you were going to fill a 45° angle with the same 2" spacing, the outer curve would begin 0.83" after the inner curve and end 0.83" before the inner curve ends. The spacing at the midpoint would be 2.16" on center. You don't get much additional spacing using the same radius in the smaller angle, but if you use a larger radius on the inner curve the spacing at the midpoint opens up. In this example if 28" was used on the outer curve and 29" on the inner curve the spacing at the midpoint would be 2.25" on center.
 




Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a commision from some of the links and ads shown on this website (Learn More Here)


ModelRailroadForums.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com

RailroadBookstore.com - An online railroad bookstore featuring a curated selection of new and used railroad books. Railroad pictorials, railroad history, steam locomotives, passenger trains, modern railroading. Hundreds of titles available, most at discount prices! We also have a video and children's book section.

ModelRailroadBookstore.com - An online model railroad bookstore featuring a curated selection of new and used books. Layout design, track plans, scenery and structure building, wiring, DCC, Tinplate, Toy Trains, Price Guides and more.

Top