ModelRailroadForums.com is a free Model Railroad Discussion Forum and photo gallery. We cover all scales and sizes of model railroads. Online since 2002, it's one of the oldest and largest model railroad forums on the web. Whether you're a master model railroader or just getting started, you'll find something of interest here.
I am working on the design for a staging module for the modular (or at least sectional) layout I'm designing more generally. I want to use a basically domino approach for a host of reasons. I'd like a staging yard that fits on one of the dominos, which means doing everything possible to reduce the length of the yard ladder.
I'm wondering about eliminating the yard ladder entirely. It seems like I ought to able to design a turntable such that rotating it bit by bit I provide a through route to multiple tracks. Am I out to lunch here? Or has anyone seen such a thing?
How long is it going to be? You could just make a 2x8 section that can slide back and forth laterally (like a drawer). Each train is parked in the yard, and you just slide the section to the track that you want to operate.
The problem with the transfer table is that in my circumstance it will limit the number of staging tracks to those that fit on a smaller footprint than the domino, which is why I was hoping to use the round table. Maybe there's a workaround I'm missing, and I'm definitely up for being educated.
My interoperability standard calls for double track mainlines at module/section ends. The mains are on 1.5' centers (N scale). The first main is 3" in from the edge. Module depth is 18". This is essentially half of the bend track standard, which will allow interoperability with modules owned by local club members, who cut their bend track modules in half down the middle to form MaiNetrak. I wasn't there; don't ask me.
I lose a number of tracks with the transfer table because if the module is against the wall I can't push the table past the inside edge, don't I? Maybe it doesn't matter - or maybe the answer is to make the staging module deeper? Or maybe I don't really need 12 staging tracks...
The Brits use a pivoting sort of transfer table thing. Imagine a transfer table that pivots on a central point as opposed to sliding straight in / out (forward / back?)
Perhaps a hybrid design like that - pseudo turntable and transfer table - would work for you.
The Brits use a pivoting sort of transfer table thing. Imagine a transfer table that pivots on a central point as opposed to sliding straight in / out (forward / back?)
Perhaps a hybrid design like that - pseudo turntable and transfer table - would work for you.
Yes, it is called a sector plate. it pivots at one end, and connects to multiple tracks on the other.
There are problems with the transfer table, though, it would have to be as long as a train to effectively switch it, and therefore does not fit your idea of shortening the ladder.
I'm thinking a sector plate or a compound ladder is your best bet here.
